Tuesday, August 27, 2013
Monday, August 26, 2013
Everyone
has friends! But why is it that we try so hard to keep them close to
us? A study done by researchers in the University of Virginia suggests
that we associate kith and kin with ourselves.
This study was published in the August issue of the journal Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience.
James Coan, psychology professor at University of Virginia, along with his colleagues used functional
MRI brain scans to study 22 young adults. The fMRI was used to monitor
brain activity in the participants while they received threats of mild
electrical shocks being delivered to themselves, to a friend or to a
stranger.
The anterior insula, putamen and supramarginal gyrus
(brain regions responsible for threat response) experienced activity
when the threat was targeted at the subject. This was as expected.
However, when the threat was targeted at a friend, the same areas in the
brain lighted up, as though the threat was targeted at the self. In
contrast, when the threat was targeted at a stranger, the same areas in
the brain experienced little activity.
Coan says, “Our self
comes to include the people we feel close to.” The reason for this is
that humans need to have allies and friends. Eventually, humans perceive
their friends to be the same as themselves. Friendship and alliance
likely evolved because it allowed for resource expansion. A threat can
take away resources. With friendship, common goals are formed and
survivability increases.
“We can understand the pain or difficulty they may be going through in the same way we understand our own pain,” said Coan.
Read all about it: http://bit.ly/19LMJCW
Image URL: http://bit.ly/19mt8Jg
Everyone
has friends! But why is it that we try so hard to keep them close to
us? A study done by researchers in the University of Virginia suggests
that we associate kith and kin with ourselves.
This study was published in the August issue of the journal Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience.
James Coan, psychology professor at University of Virginia, along with his colleagues used functional MRI brain scans to study 22 young adults. The fMRI was used to monitor brain activity in the participants while they received threats of mild electrical shocks being delivered to themselves, to a friend or to a stranger.
The anterior insula, putamen and supramarginal gyrus (brain regions responsible for threat response) experienced activity when the threat was targeted at the subject. This was as expected. However, when the threat was targeted at a friend, the same areas in the brain lighted up, as though the threat was targeted at the self. In contrast, when the threat was targeted at a stranger, the same areas in the brain experienced little activity.
Coan says, “Our self comes to include the people we feel close to.” The reason for this is that humans need to have allies and friends. Eventually, humans perceive their friends to be the same as themselves. Friendship and alliance likely evolved because it allowed for resource expansion. A threat can take away resources. With friendship, common goals are formed and survivability increases.
“We can understand the pain or difficulty they may be going through in the same way we understand our own pain,” said Coan.
Read all about it: http://bit.ly/19LMJCW
Image URL: http://bit.ly/19mt8Jg
This study was published in the August issue of the journal Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience.
James Coan, psychology professor at University of Virginia, along with his colleagues used functional MRI brain scans to study 22 young adults. The fMRI was used to monitor brain activity in the participants while they received threats of mild electrical shocks being delivered to themselves, to a friend or to a stranger.
The anterior insula, putamen and supramarginal gyrus (brain regions responsible for threat response) experienced activity when the threat was targeted at the subject. This was as expected. However, when the threat was targeted at a friend, the same areas in the brain lighted up, as though the threat was targeted at the self. In contrast, when the threat was targeted at a stranger, the same areas in the brain experienced little activity.
Coan says, “Our self comes to include the people we feel close to.” The reason for this is that humans need to have allies and friends. Eventually, humans perceive their friends to be the same as themselves. Friendship and alliance likely evolved because it allowed for resource expansion. A threat can take away resources. With friendship, common goals are formed and survivability increases.
“We can understand the pain or difficulty they may be going through in the same way we understand our own pain,” said Coan.
Read all about it: http://bit.ly/19LMJCW
Image URL: http://bit.ly/19mt8Jg
Sunday, August 25, 2013
Sunday, August 18, 2013
New research demonstrates the huge necks of sauropods were not as flexible as previously thought.
Until now, ideas of how flexible sauropod necks were have been based
entirely on the position of neck vertebrae. Computer models built around
this idea have been used in museum installations and TV shows like
"Walking with Dinosaurs", depicting the same sauropods grazing from low
vegetation to the treetops. This new
research demonstrates a key problem with these models - they don't
consider the effects of soft tissue like muscles.
To get a
clear picture of how much soft tissue could affect flexibility, the team
looked at the closest thing to a long-necked dinosaur we have today -
ostriches. Giraffes might seem the logical choice, having a more similar
shape to sauropods than ostriches, but they have far fewer neck
vertebrae.
Using three donated ostrich necks, the team
measured neck flexibility as the necks were before removing soft tissues
and measuring again. Their results showed the neck becomes more
flexible as you remove more tissue. The more muscle and cartilage the
neck has, the less flexible it is.
"The soft tissue is what
allows the neck to flex, but it also places an absolute limit on how far
you can move the neck," Matthew Cobley (evolutionary biologist at the
University of Utah and lead author) told io9. "It seems common sense —
and it is — but it's not something that was considered in detail
before."
Understanding how flexible sauropod necks were can
tell us more about how they lived and ate. Lack of flexibility likely
restricted them to a particular niche (being unable to eat from a large
range of heights) and would have required them to spend more time
searching for food. It may also help us understand why they survived for
so long.
To read the paper: http://bit.ly/147qrHk
Image credit: SPL. Sourced from the BBC article.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/ science-environment-23679932
http://io9.com/ this-dinosaurs-huge-body-didnt- work-the-way-we-though-1145710 156
http://www.sciencedaily.com/ releases/2013/08/ 130814191912.htm
New research demonstrates the huge necks of sauropods were not as flexible as previously thought.
Until now, ideas of how flexible sauropod necks were have been based entirely on the position of neck vertebrae. Computer models built around this idea have been used in museum installations and TV shows like "Walking with Dinosaurs", depicting the same sauropods grazing from low vegetation to the treetops. This new research demonstrates a key problem with these models - they don't consider the effects of soft tissue like muscles.
To get a clear picture of how much soft tissue could affect flexibility, the team looked at the closest thing to a long-necked dinosaur we have today - ostriches. Giraffes might seem the logical choice, having a more similar shape to sauropods than ostriches, but they have far fewer neck vertebrae.
Using three donated ostrich necks, the team measured neck flexibility as the necks were before removing soft tissues and measuring again. Their results showed the neck becomes more flexible as you remove more tissue. The more muscle and cartilage the neck has, the less flexible it is.
"The soft tissue is what allows the neck to flex, but it also places an absolute limit on how far you can move the neck," Matthew Cobley (evolutionary biologist at the University of Utah and lead author) told io9. "It seems common sense — and it is — but it's not something that was considered in detail before."
Understanding how flexible sauropod necks were can tell us more about how they lived and ate. Lack of flexibility likely restricted them to a particular niche (being unable to eat from a large range of heights) and would have required them to spend more time searching for food. It may also help us understand why they survived for so long.
To read the paper: http://bit.ly/147qrHk
Image credit: SPL. Sourced from the BBC article.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/ science-environment-23679932
http://io9.com/ this-dinosaurs-huge-body-didnt- work-the-way-we-though-1145710 156
http://www.sciencedaily.com/ releases/2013/08/ 130814191912.htm
Until now, ideas of how flexible sauropod necks were have been based entirely on the position of neck vertebrae. Computer models built around this idea have been used in museum installations and TV shows like "Walking with Dinosaurs", depicting the same sauropods grazing from low vegetation to the treetops. This new research demonstrates a key problem with these models - they don't consider the effects of soft tissue like muscles.
To get a clear picture of how much soft tissue could affect flexibility, the team looked at the closest thing to a long-necked dinosaur we have today - ostriches. Giraffes might seem the logical choice, having a more similar shape to sauropods than ostriches, but they have far fewer neck vertebrae.
Using three donated ostrich necks, the team measured neck flexibility as the necks were before removing soft tissues and measuring again. Their results showed the neck becomes more flexible as you remove more tissue. The more muscle and cartilage the neck has, the less flexible it is.
"The soft tissue is what allows the neck to flex, but it also places an absolute limit on how far you can move the neck," Matthew Cobley (evolutionary biologist at the University of Utah and lead author) told io9. "It seems common sense — and it is — but it's not something that was considered in detail before."
Understanding how flexible sauropod necks were can tell us more about how they lived and ate. Lack of flexibility likely restricted them to a particular niche (being unable to eat from a large range of heights) and would have required them to spend more time searching for food. It may also help us understand why they survived for so long.
To read the paper: http://bit.ly/147qrHk
Image credit: SPL. Sourced from the BBC article.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/
http://io9.com/
http://www.sciencedaily.com/
Saturday, August 17, 2013
Megaconus
mammaliaformis is the name given to the newly discovered fossil of a
165 million year old proto-mammal*. The fossil was found in Inner
Mongolia and paleontological evidence suggests that hair was an
adaptation that evolved before true-mammals ever existed.
Megaconus, which lived in the Jurassic Period has several adaptations
that are found in modern mammals. The fossil had a clear halo of
guard hairs and underfur residue. However, the hair around the
abdominal area was sparse. This has led the researchers to believe that
it had a naked underbelly. This makes Megaconus the second known
proto-mammal to possess hair. Megaconus possessed a long spur composed
of keratin on its heel. This may have been a poisonous spur, similar to
those found in male platypuses. The presence of this spur suggests that
the specimen was a male of its species. The fossil showed that Megaconus
was roughly the size of a cat or small dog. It probably led an
omnivorous lifestyle, based on the dental features, which showed that
Megaconus was adapted to eating both plant matter and small animals.
While Megaconus was very similar to mammals, reptilian traits still
existed in it. It possesses a primitive middle ear that was attached to
the jaw. The anklebones and vertebral column were reminiscent of other
prehistoric mammal-like reptiles.
"We cannot say that Megaconus
is our direct ancestor, but it certainly looks like a great-great-grand
uncle 165 million years removed. These features are evidence of what
our mammalian ancestor looked like during the Triassic-Jurassic
transition," said one of the researchers.
This discovery helps
us to understand the transition of proto-mammals to modern mammals. It
shows that several hallmark characteristics of modern mammals
(specifically, those relating to skin and hair) were developed in
pre-mammalian groups.
*Early predecessors of mammals
Read all about it: http://bit.ly/193LD1B
Image URL: http://bit.ly/13Q84qk
Megaconus
mammaliaformis is the name given to the newly discovered fossil of a
165 million year old proto-mammal*. The fossil was found in Inner
Mongolia and paleontological evidence suggests that hair was an
adaptation that evolved before true-mammals ever existed.
Megaconus, which lived in the Jurassic Period has several adaptations that are found in modern mammals. The fossil had a clear halo of guard hairs and underfur residue. However, the hair around the abdominal area was sparse. This has led the researchers to believe that it had a naked underbelly. This makes Megaconus the second known proto-mammal to possess hair. Megaconus possessed a long spur composed of keratin on its heel. This may have been a poisonous spur, similar to those found in male platypuses. The presence of this spur suggests that the specimen was a male of its species. The fossil showed that Megaconus was roughly the size of a cat or small dog. It probably led an omnivorous lifestyle, based on the dental features, which showed that Megaconus was adapted to eating both plant matter and small animals.
While Megaconus was very similar to mammals, reptilian traits still existed in it. It possesses a primitive middle ear that was attached to the jaw. The anklebones and vertebral column were reminiscent of other prehistoric mammal-like reptiles.
"We cannot say that Megaconus is our direct ancestor, but it certainly looks like a great-great-grand uncle 165 million years removed. These features are evidence of what our mammalian ancestor looked like during the Triassic-Jurassic transition," said one of the researchers.
This discovery helps us to understand the transition of proto-mammals to modern mammals. It shows that several hallmark characteristics of modern mammals (specifically, those relating to skin and hair) were developed in pre-mammalian groups.
*Early predecessors of mammals
Read all about it: http://bit.ly/193LD1B
Image URL: http://bit.ly/13Q84qk
Megaconus, which lived in the Jurassic Period has several adaptations that are found in modern mammals. The fossil had a clear halo of guard hairs and underfur residue. However, the hair around the abdominal area was sparse. This has led the researchers to believe that it had a naked underbelly. This makes Megaconus the second known proto-mammal to possess hair. Megaconus possessed a long spur composed of keratin on its heel. This may have been a poisonous spur, similar to those found in male platypuses. The presence of this spur suggests that the specimen was a male of its species. The fossil showed that Megaconus was roughly the size of a cat or small dog. It probably led an omnivorous lifestyle, based on the dental features, which showed that Megaconus was adapted to eating both plant matter and small animals.
While Megaconus was very similar to mammals, reptilian traits still existed in it. It possesses a primitive middle ear that was attached to the jaw. The anklebones and vertebral column were reminiscent of other prehistoric mammal-like reptiles.
"We cannot say that Megaconus is our direct ancestor, but it certainly looks like a great-great-grand uncle 165 million years removed. These features are evidence of what our mammalian ancestor looked like during the Triassic-Jurassic transition," said one of the researchers.
This discovery helps us to understand the transition of proto-mammals to modern mammals. It shows that several hallmark characteristics of modern mammals (specifically, those relating to skin and hair) were developed in pre-mammalian groups.
*Early predecessors of mammals
Read all about it: http://bit.ly/193LD1B
Image URL: http://bit.ly/13Q84qk
Friday, August 16, 2013
After
more than a decade of work, scientists have found a new carnivorous
mammal living in Ecuador. The animal is named the olinguito and is the
first new carnivorous species discovered in the Western Hemisphere in 35
years.
It might have taken over 100 years, but the olinguito
has finally been identified and given a proper binomial name:
Bassaricyon neblina. Though olinguitos have been observed
in the wild, kept in zoos and been preserved in museum drawers for a
long time, they've always been described as olingos due to the animals'
similarities.
Both olinguitos and olingos measure around 35cm
(14 inches) long and weigh nearly a kilogram (2 lbs). They both belong
to the order Carnivora, a group that encompasses mammals such as dogs,
cats and bears. More specifically they belong to the same family as
racoons, Procyonidae.
Identification of the olinguito began a
decade ago when Kristofer Helgen was sorting olingo specimens in a
Chicago museum, hoping to determine how many species existed. While
sorting he noticed several skulls and skins seemed a bit unusual. DNA
testing and examination of specimens from other museums confirmed that
these remains were not from olungos.
Identifying new species
from museum specimens is exciting, but Helgen and his team had no idea
if olinguitos still existed in the wild. Had they identified a
now-extinct species? Using field reports and clues from the specimens,
the team were able to predict where olinguitos might be found and
restrict their search to the cloud forests of Ecuador and Colombia.
The team found the olingutios on the western slopes of the Andes and
recorded everything they could about this new carnivore. Olinguitos are
nocturnal, live at high elevations and eat mainly fruit, but also eats
birds and small mammals. They rarely leave the trees and produce a
single offspring at a time.
But as Helgen said in a statement,
giving the olinguito a name is just the beginning. "Proving that a
species exists and giving it a name is where everything starts. This is a
beautiful animal, but we know so little about it. How many countries
does it live in? What else can we learn about its behaviour? What do we
need to do to ensure its conservation?"
Photo credit: Mark Gurney.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/ science-environment-23701151
http://www.livescience.com/ 38920-olinguito-new-species-ecu ador.html
http://newsdesk.si.edu/ releases/ smithsonian-scientists-discover -new-species-carnivore
After
more than a decade of work, scientists have found a new carnivorous
mammal living in Ecuador. The animal is named the olinguito and is the
first new carnivorous species discovered in the Western Hemisphere in 35
years.
It might have taken over 100 years, but the olinguito has finally been identified and given a proper binomial name: Bassaricyon neblina. Though olinguitos have been observed in the wild, kept in zoos and been preserved in museum drawers for a long time, they've always been described as olingos due to the animals' similarities.
Both olinguitos and olingos measure around 35cm (14 inches) long and weigh nearly a kilogram (2 lbs). They both belong to the order Carnivora, a group that encompasses mammals such as dogs, cats and bears. More specifically they belong to the same family as racoons, Procyonidae.
Identification of the olinguito began a decade ago when Kristofer Helgen was sorting olingo specimens in a Chicago museum, hoping to determine how many species existed. While sorting he noticed several skulls and skins seemed a bit unusual. DNA testing and examination of specimens from other museums confirmed that these remains were not from olungos.
Identifying new species from museum specimens is exciting, but Helgen and his team had no idea if olinguitos still existed in the wild. Had they identified a now-extinct species? Using field reports and clues from the specimens, the team were able to predict where olinguitos might be found and restrict their search to the cloud forests of Ecuador and Colombia.
The team found the olingutios on the western slopes of the Andes and recorded everything they could about this new carnivore. Olinguitos are nocturnal, live at high elevations and eat mainly fruit, but also eats birds and small mammals. They rarely leave the trees and produce a single offspring at a time.
But as Helgen said in a statement, giving the olinguito a name is just the beginning. "Proving that a species exists and giving it a name is where everything starts. This is a beautiful animal, but we know so little about it. How many countries does it live in? What else can we learn about its behaviour? What do we need to do to ensure its conservation?"
Photo credit: Mark Gurney.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/ science-environment-23701151
http://www.livescience.com/ 38920-olinguito-new-species-ecu ador.html
http://newsdesk.si.edu/ releases/ smithsonian-scientists-discover -new-species-carnivore
It might have taken over 100 years, but the olinguito has finally been identified and given a proper binomial name: Bassaricyon neblina. Though olinguitos have been observed in the wild, kept in zoos and been preserved in museum drawers for a long time, they've always been described as olingos due to the animals' similarities.
Both olinguitos and olingos measure around 35cm (14 inches) long and weigh nearly a kilogram (2 lbs). They both belong to the order Carnivora, a group that encompasses mammals such as dogs, cats and bears. More specifically they belong to the same family as racoons, Procyonidae.
Identification of the olinguito began a decade ago when Kristofer Helgen was sorting olingo specimens in a Chicago museum, hoping to determine how many species existed. While sorting he noticed several skulls and skins seemed a bit unusual. DNA testing and examination of specimens from other museums confirmed that these remains were not from olungos.
Identifying new species from museum specimens is exciting, but Helgen and his team had no idea if olinguitos still existed in the wild. Had they identified a now-extinct species? Using field reports and clues from the specimens, the team were able to predict where olinguitos might be found and restrict their search to the cloud forests of Ecuador and Colombia.
The team found the olingutios on the western slopes of the Andes and recorded everything they could about this new carnivore. Olinguitos are nocturnal, live at high elevations and eat mainly fruit, but also eats birds and small mammals. They rarely leave the trees and produce a single offspring at a time.
But as Helgen said in a statement, giving the olinguito a name is just the beginning. "Proving that a species exists and giving it a name is where everything starts. This is a beautiful animal, but we know so little about it. How many countries does it live in? What else can we learn about its behaviour? What do we need to do to ensure its conservation?"
Photo credit: Mark Gurney.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/
http://www.livescience.com/
http://newsdesk.si.edu/
Monday, August 12, 2013
Sunday, August 11, 2013
Saturday, August 10, 2013
Tuesday, August 6, 2013
Sunday, August 4, 2013
Babies
sleep a lot, don’t they? That seems to be true for more than just
humans and mammals! A team of researchers from the Max Planck Institute
for Ornithology and the University of Lausanne uncovered fascinating new
information about REM sleep.
REM sleep (Rapid Eye Movement
Sleep) is the phase of sleep during which we experience our most vivid
dreams. During REM sleep, our brain experiences awake-like
activity. A distinctive feature of REM sleep is that mammals earlier in
their lives experience a greater amount of REM sleep than adults. For
newborn humans, 50% of their sleep is REM sleep. Adults spend a quarter
or less of their sleeping hours in REM. Birds are the only non-mammalian
group of animals that are known to experience REM sleep. However, it
was unknown if baby birds experience more REM sleep than adults.
The researchers attempted to solve this mystery, using wild barn owls
as their subjects. Using minimally invasive EEGs and movement data
loggers, the scientists recorded the sleep behaviour in 66 owlets of
varying maturity. Throughout the recordings, which lasted for up to five
days, the owlets stayed in their nest and were fed normally by their
parents. After the recordings, all the owlets eventually fledged and
went on the breed in the following year. So it is clear that this
observational study had no adverse effects on the owls.
The
results showed that the owlets spent a large amount of time in REM
sleep, during which their brains showed awake-like activity. Although
their eyes remained closed, the owlets would slowly nod their heads. The
researchers also found that the time spent in REM sleep decreased as
the owlets matured.
The researchers also investigated the
connection between sleep and the expression of a gene responsible for
producing dark feather spots. The same gene is also necessary for the
production of thyroid and insulin hormones. These in turn are linked to
brain development in the owls. One of the researchers mentioned that
they had “found that melanic spotting in owls covaries with a variety of
behavioral and physiological traits, many of which also have links to
sleep, such as immune system function and energy regulation." They
discovered that owlets with a higher level of expression of the
abovementioned gene experienced less REM sleep than was expected for
their age. This suggests that they were experiencing greater brain
development than owlets with lower gene expression.
To
completely uncover the intricate relationships between REM sleep,
feather pigmentation and brain development, additional research must be
done. It is hoped that studying the variation of REM sleep with age can
provide a clue to the long-standing mystery of REM sleep.
Read all about it: http://bit.ly/145a2m1
Image URL: http://bit.ly/13EPxcA
Babies
sleep a lot, don’t they? That seems to be true for more than just
humans and mammals! A team of researchers from the Max Planck Institute
for Ornithology and the University of Lausanne uncovered fascinating new
information about REM sleep.
REM sleep (Rapid Eye Movement Sleep) is the phase of sleep during which we experience our most vivid dreams. During REM sleep, our brain experiences awake-like activity. A distinctive feature of REM sleep is that mammals earlier in their lives experience a greater amount of REM sleep than adults. For newborn humans, 50% of their sleep is REM sleep. Adults spend a quarter or less of their sleeping hours in REM. Birds are the only non-mammalian group of animals that are known to experience REM sleep. However, it was unknown if baby birds experience more REM sleep than adults.
The researchers attempted to solve this mystery, using wild barn owls as their subjects. Using minimally invasive EEGs and movement data loggers, the scientists recorded the sleep behaviour in 66 owlets of varying maturity. Throughout the recordings, which lasted for up to five days, the owlets stayed in their nest and were fed normally by their parents. After the recordings, all the owlets eventually fledged and went on the breed in the following year. So it is clear that this observational study had no adverse effects on the owls.
The results showed that the owlets spent a large amount of time in REM sleep, during which their brains showed awake-like activity. Although their eyes remained closed, the owlets would slowly nod their heads. The researchers also found that the time spent in REM sleep decreased as the owlets matured.
The researchers also investigated the connection between sleep and the expression of a gene responsible for producing dark feather spots. The same gene is also necessary for the production of thyroid and insulin hormones. These in turn are linked to brain development in the owls. One of the researchers mentioned that they had “found that melanic spotting in owls covaries with a variety of behavioral and physiological traits, many of which also have links to sleep, such as immune system function and energy regulation." They discovered that owlets with a higher level of expression of the abovementioned gene experienced less REM sleep than was expected for their age. This suggests that they were experiencing greater brain development than owlets with lower gene expression.
To completely uncover the intricate relationships between REM sleep, feather pigmentation and brain development, additional research must be done. It is hoped that studying the variation of REM sleep with age can provide a clue to the long-standing mystery of REM sleep.
Read all about it: http://bit.ly/145a2m1
Image URL: http://bit.ly/13EPxcA
REM sleep (Rapid Eye Movement Sleep) is the phase of sleep during which we experience our most vivid dreams. During REM sleep, our brain experiences awake-like activity. A distinctive feature of REM sleep is that mammals earlier in their lives experience a greater amount of REM sleep than adults. For newborn humans, 50% of their sleep is REM sleep. Adults spend a quarter or less of their sleeping hours in REM. Birds are the only non-mammalian group of animals that are known to experience REM sleep. However, it was unknown if baby birds experience more REM sleep than adults.
The researchers attempted to solve this mystery, using wild barn owls as their subjects. Using minimally invasive EEGs and movement data loggers, the scientists recorded the sleep behaviour in 66 owlets of varying maturity. Throughout the recordings, which lasted for up to five days, the owlets stayed in their nest and were fed normally by their parents. After the recordings, all the owlets eventually fledged and went on the breed in the following year. So it is clear that this observational study had no adverse effects on the owls.
The results showed that the owlets spent a large amount of time in REM sleep, during which their brains showed awake-like activity. Although their eyes remained closed, the owlets would slowly nod their heads. The researchers also found that the time spent in REM sleep decreased as the owlets matured.
The researchers also investigated the connection between sleep and the expression of a gene responsible for producing dark feather spots. The same gene is also necessary for the production of thyroid and insulin hormones. These in turn are linked to brain development in the owls. One of the researchers mentioned that they had “found that melanic spotting in owls covaries with a variety of behavioral and physiological traits, many of which also have links to sleep, such as immune system function and energy regulation." They discovered that owlets with a higher level of expression of the abovementioned gene experienced less REM sleep than was expected for their age. This suggests that they were experiencing greater brain development than owlets with lower gene expression.
To completely uncover the intricate relationships between REM sleep, feather pigmentation and brain development, additional research must be done. It is hoped that studying the variation of REM sleep with age can provide a clue to the long-standing mystery of REM sleep.
Read all about it: http://bit.ly/145a2m1
Image URL: http://bit.ly/13EPxcA
Saturday, August 3, 2013
Friday, August 2, 2013
Wild tigers are disappearing, but...........
Sandeep Sharma of the Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute in
Washington, D.C., and his colleagues used genetic analysis and
historical data to show that wild tigers in central India (estimated at
273 individuals) are using strips of forests, or "forest corridors," to
find each other and mate. Despite quickly encroaching human development,
the tigers are using what habitat is left, and hopefully keeping their species from extinction.
These forest corridors are not protected, however. Even now, companies
are buying and developing the land that these tigers are using.
Picture courtesy of:
http://www.treehugger.com/ endangered-species/ wild-tiger-population-dropped-b y-968-in-20-years.html
Sources:
http://www.sciencenews.org/ view/generic/id/352006/ description/ News_in_Brief_Tigers_meet_mix_i n_forest_corridors
Wild tigers are disappearing, but...........
Sandeep Sharma of the Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute in Washington, D.C., and his colleagues used genetic analysis and historical data to show that wild tigers in central India (estimated at 273 individuals) are using strips of forests, or "forest corridors," to find each other and mate. Despite quickly encroaching human development, the tigers are using what habitat is left, and hopefully keeping their species from extinction.
These forest corridors are not protected, however. Even now, companies are buying and developing the land that these tigers are using.
Picture courtesy of:
http://www.treehugger.com/ endangered-species/ wild-tiger-population-dropped-b y-968-in-20-years.html
Sources:
http://www.sciencenews.org/ view/generic/id/352006/ description/ News_in_Brief_Tigers_meet_mix_i n_forest_corridors
Sandeep Sharma of the Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute in Washington, D.C., and his colleagues used genetic analysis and historical data to show that wild tigers in central India (estimated at 273 individuals) are using strips of forests, or "forest corridors," to find each other and mate. Despite quickly encroaching human development, the tigers are using what habitat is left, and hopefully keeping their species from extinction.
These forest corridors are not protected, however. Even now, companies are buying and developing the land that these tigers are using.
Picture courtesy of:
http://www.treehugger.com/
Sources:
http://www.sciencenews.org/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)