Thursday, May 16, 2013

Only around 2% of the human genome actually codes for proteins. The rest is known as non-coding DNA, and much of it seems to be the remnants of evolutionarily defunct genes and viruses that hijacked a ride on our chromosomes. Biologists have long puzzled over this seemingly redundant DNA and many hypothesis have been put forward for why it exists.

A study published this week suggests that contrary to previous hypothesis, non-coding DNA is not necessary for complex life. Researchers have sequenced the genome of genome of the carnivorous plant Utricularia gibba and found that more than 97% of the genome consists of coding DNA and DNA that controls these genes. Unlike humans and most other examined genomes, U. gibba seems to have the ability to delete non-coding "junk" DNA.

More info: http://bit.ly/12pnXBC
Only around 2% of the human genome actually codes for proteins. The rest is known as non-coding DNA, and much of it seems to be the remnants of evolutionarily defunct genes and viruses that hijacked a ride on our chromosomes. Biologists have long puzzled over this seemingly redundant DNA and many hypothesis have been put forward for why it exists.

A study published this week suggests that contrary to previous hypothesis, non-coding DNA is not necessary for complex life. Researchers have sequenced the genome of genome of the carnivorous plant Utricularia gibba and found that more than 97% of the genome consists of coding DNA and DNA that controls these genes. Unlike humans and most other examined genomes, U. gibba seems to have the ability to delete non-coding "junk" DNA.

More info: http://bit.ly/12pnXBC

No comments:

Post a Comment