Thursday, September 20, 2012

Doubt has been shed on the effectiveness of ecosystem 'offsetting'. This is the practice of permitting damage to or total destruction of an ecosystem on the basis that it can be rebuilt or relocated. There is fear that policymakers do not fully understand the monetary costs or difficulty of restoring biodiversity when this method is used- it is very expensive to attempt to create an entire new eco
system from waste land. It is a risky tactic as there is no guarantee that new ecosystems will achieve the biodiversity level of the ecosystem it is supposed to be replacing- a forest of saplings is unlikely to support the same biodiversity and species as an ancient woodland!

That is not to say that the 'offsetting' of ecosystems is never a viable option, there are some very successful (and expensive) examples such as Perth's Kings Park and Jarrah Forest restoration work by aluminium producer Alcoa. However it is never certain that the former biodiversity level will be reached - and it is hard to tell if you have successfully restored as there are different ways of measuring biodiversity.

Source:
http://www.ecology.com/2012/08/17/replacing-lost-environments/
That article is on this Biological Conservation paper (which is behind a paywall):
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320712002716

No comments:

Post a Comment