"The
central claim in the first argument is that atheism is the default
position, and what that means is that, if there is no evidence in
support of the existence of God, then it is reasonable to believe that
God does not exist.
The essential line of thought which I would hope
to develop later on is that if you consider other things like fairies,
leprechauns, golden teacups orbiting around Venus,
and so on, I would suggest that we have no evidence against the
existence of those sorts of things, but if I asked you whether you were
agnostic I think the answer would be 'no.' You would believe there are
no fairies, no leprechauns, no golden teacups orbiting around Venus.
That illustrates the general principle in regard to God’s existence
that the burden of proof must fall upon the person who is arguing in
support of God's existence. If there’s no positive support for it, then
the other side wins by default."
Michael Tooley (Professor of Philosophy)
"The
central claim in the first argument is that atheism is the default
position, and what that means is that, if there is no evidence in
support of the existence of God, then it is reasonable to believe that
God does not exist.
The essential line of thought which I would hope to develop later on is that if you consider other things like fairies, leprechauns, golden teacups orbiting around Venus,
The essential line of thought which I would hope to develop later on is that if you consider other things like fairies, leprechauns, golden teacups orbiting around Venus,
and so on, I would suggest that we have no evidence against the
existence of those sorts of things, but if I asked you whether you were
agnostic I think the answer would be 'no.' You would believe there are
no fairies, no leprechauns, no golden teacups orbiting around Venus.
That illustrates the general principle in regard to God’s existence that the burden of proof must fall upon the person who is arguing in support of God's existence. If there’s no positive support for it, then the other side wins by default."
Michael Tooley (Professor of Philosophy)
That illustrates the general principle in regard to God’s existence that the burden of proof must fall upon the person who is arguing in support of God's existence. If there’s no positive support for it, then the other side wins by default."
Michael Tooley (Professor of Philosophy)
No comments:
Post a Comment